Kyle

QiqJoe

Re: Star Trek: The Journey

August 09 2011
Woohoo! I have finally caught up with The Journey, and in warp speed fashion!
Jason Featheringham

TheJase

Listing Accolades on stonewallfleet.com

August 09 2011
I would love to be able to adorn my profile with a list of my completed accolades. It might be nice to have that as a "section."

Anyone else think so?
Joseph Baker

Jerran

Re: JJ Abrams on Gays in Star Trek

August 09 2011
Quote by SaintPlazma
Oh then we could make Vulcan love Slave XI: Gay Klingons a Go-go (insert bad bat'leth joke here)


I prefer Bajorans to Vulcans. Much more passionate. Besides, the whole seven years thing sounds too much like straight marriage ;)
Brandon Felczer

CapnBranFlakes

Re: Jordan sets a course for new Star Trek theme park

August 09 2011
Sad news from the TrekMovie twitter account:

Dear Internet: There is NOT a $1.5B Star Trek theme park being built in Jordan. There is a $1.5B theme park being built with a ST attraction
TweetDeck • 8/9/11 9:26 AM
Dave

Altimus

Re: "Extremely emotional. I was in tears."

August 09 2011
Hehe! Very creative! I can actually imagine some people i know doing this!
Angel

Angelsilhouette

Re: JJ Abrams on Gays in Star Trek

August 09 2011
Quote by SaintPlazma
Oh then we could make Vulcan love Slave XI: Gay Klingons a Go-go (insert bad bat'leth joke here)


Is that a Dak'tagh in your pocket or are you just feeling a bit Bat'leth about our date last night?

:3
Brandon Felczer

CapnBranFlakes

Re: Star Trek: The Journey

August 09 2011
:ds9:


Episode 348 - Deep Space Nine - "Visionary" - 02/27/1995

http://www.allstepisodes.com/megvid.php?n=3317

Exposure to radiation causes O'Brien to jump hours into the future for brief periods, as Deep Space Nine hosts Romulan and Klingon delegations.


Enjoy!

Unknown Person

Re: JJ Abrams on Gays in Star Trek

August 09 2011
Oh then we could make Vulcan love Slave XI: Gay Klingons a Go-go (insert bad bat'leth joke here)
Eric

chemkarate

Edit to "Strength From Diversity"

August 09 2011
Just wanted to give a quick heads-up that the most recent post of "Strength from Diversity" just got a major edit (since the board doesn't alert users to edits). So, if you've been following the story as posts go up, I suggest re-reading the most recent post.

There was a miscommunication with regard to the details of a character. While I do take minor liberties with characters in order to make a cohesive story, this divergence was too much for me to let sit alone. It doesn't affect the arc of the story, but it does change some motivations.

Anyway, hopefully I won't have to make too many of these edits again. :D
Unknown Person liked this
Joseph Baker

Jerran

Re: JJ Abrams on Gays in Star Trek

August 09 2011
Quote by camenecium


Abrams isn't attempting social commentary in his style-over-substance body of work. The veneer of Trek he crudely splashed over his movie didn't make it Star Trek to me, so I can't hold him to those higher standards that Roddenberry's Trek inexplicably failed to meet.


I tend to agree. I think the boat sailed on Star Trek and social commentary long ago. We won't get a chance to have a gay character until another series comes out, if ever due to how the waters were soiled by Enterprise. It just doesn't make sense to have it in the movie. And if they do put it in the movie, you know it's just going to be some gratuitous female Vulcan on female Orion sex slave thing.
Bradley Barbour

bradley1701

Re: JJ Abrams on Gays in Star Trek

August 09 2011
This episode has already been done...it was TNG's Final Mission.
Seannewboy

Seannewboy

Re: True blood anyone?

August 09 2011
Bill was not in his right mind, it may not apply.
Jay Eudy

Six-of-Nine

Re: True blood anyone?

August 09 2011
She ignored a command from her maker. Enough said.
Seannewboy

Seannewboy

Re: True blood anyone?

August 09 2011
Her blood in him thats also why i think he got past the guard, he is currently on v, and she has a thing for him just as he does for her.
Paul L P LeBel Jr

LeBelJr

Re: JJ Abrams on Gays in Star Trek

August 08 2011
Quote by Angelsilhouette
Quote by chemkarate
Quote by NicholasJohn16
We could go full blown out and have Star Trek meet Brokeback Mountain. Two lone ensigns, stranded on a planet, they must cling to each other to survive. In the cold night, infront of a warm fire, they embrace each other . . .

Will Starfleet be able to save them . . . do they even want to be saved . . . from each other?


Well, that's it. I'm now going to change the plot of the new Stonewall story completely. Time for some hot ensign-on-ensign action.


NO!!!!


That's not dramatic enough...

Hot Ensign on Captain action! Then after they're rescued, there are the awkward gazes, the stilted conversations, the terrible secret that they must both keep... A romance spanning so many pay grades! Scandalous!

If you're gonna go, go large! :3


I agree with you NicholasJohn16. That would be great to see Captain on ensign action.:tos:
Jay Eudy

Six-of-Nine

Re: True blood anyone?

August 08 2011
Whats to stop her from killing him so she can stay out?
Seannewboy

Seannewboy

Re: Star Trekian Birthday's-Master List

August 08 2011
2 for today.
Seannewboy

Seannewboy

Re: True blood anyone?

August 08 2011
I think it is. I think Jason is unshot and Jessicawill be burned but saved from destruction by Jason.
Jay Eudy

Six-of-Nine

Re: True blood anyone?

August 08 2011
Um, tonights episode, please let it be a fake out.
Brandon Felczer

CapnBranFlakes

Re: Star Trek: The Journey

August 08 2011
:ds9:


Episode 347 - Deep Space Nine - "Prophet Motive" - 02/20/1995

http://www.allstepisodes.com/megvid.php?n=3316

Quark discovers that Grand Nagus Zek has written a new set of the Rules of Acquisition, which would put an end to the traditional Ferengi ways.


Enjoy!